Scientology Conspiracies(Part 3)

“The first thing we do, let’s kill all the lawyers”.

(Act IV, Scene II)

King Henry VI

William Shakespeare

There is much dispute in the Scientology community about events and circumstances leading the creation of RTC and CST.

Some wonder if Hubbard had any involvement at all in the establishment of these two corporate entities. Especially if one reads HCO POLICY LETTER OF 15 NOVEMBER AD8 THE SUBSTANCE AND FIRST DUTY OF HCO another policy which like the earlier example of the one relating to The Guardian and her duties has never been canceled which clearly states:

 

The most important function of HCO in any organization is that which justifies its existence.

Being the purveyor of ethics, technology and awards, HCO must then first and foremost of all its duties, be the keeper of every seal, copyright, trademark, registered mark, master tape, master book copy, and master bulletin file in the organization.

HCO Secretaries should act at once to take unto themselves and keep locked secure and not available to anyone else, the seals of the organization in the area. HCO seals for certificate validation or sealing are HCO’s by right. Organization seals are held by HCO for the “Secretarial of the Executive Director” of HASI. If HCO sees or hears of any new seals being made up for whatever purpose, the order is “seize and ask for instructions later”.

None are permitted to use such seals or any seals except HCO.
All this applies now and later. And it will become more important as time goes on. Seals, regulation of, permits only legal certificates, documents and minutes to be sealed.

Similarly, any book on Dianetics and Scientology must be copyrighted in the name of L. Ron Hubbard and the copyright becomes the property of HCO. No copyright of anything must ever be permitted to escape. In the case of its having been done (a book on the subject copyrighted in the name of someone or something else) HCO Secretary in the area must request an assignment of copyright to L. Ron Hubbard from its present owner and must be tireless and remorseless in getting the copyright, using any available means at whatever cost.

Similarly any trademark, registered mark, or patent for any sign, symbol, shield, device or design for Dianetics or Scientology or their organizations must be secured fox HCO. All these are registered to L. Ron,Hubbard and by blanket transfer are the property of HCO only. The name in which it is done is L. Ron Hubbard; the owner is then HCO.

 

Yet according to RJ 38 L Ron Hubbard donated his trademarks and registered marks to the Religious Technology Center and not mentioned but according to legal documents all his copyrights to the mysterious Church of Spiritual Technology.

Or did he?

A careful reading of both legal instruments and what is known as Trust B his final will and testament indicates that both entities have only been granted the right to protect the trademarks,registered marks and copyrights under certain conditions covered in the various by-laws and articles.

Is it possible that RTC and CST are in reality just paper tigers?

A valid question since despite the existence of RTC and CST the above HCOPL still remains in force and has never been modified or canceled.

Again falling deeper down this arcane rabbit hole of legalities we find another corporate entity created in the early 1980’s known as the Church of Scientology International replacing  Church of Scientology of California as Scientology’s “mother church” or does it?

Since according to the following policy. One again that has never been revised or canceled it says specifically in:

HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE

Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO POLICY LETTER OF 12 FEBRUARY 1969

RELIGION

 

Visual evidences that Scientology is a religion are mandatory on the PES.

Any staff who are trained at any level as auditors (but not in AOs) are to be clothed in the traditional ministerial black suit, black vest, white collar, silver cross for ordinary org wear.

Creed of the Church is to be done big and plainly posted in public areas.

Stationery is to reflect the fact that orgs are churches.

All public literature must state that Scientology is religious philosophy.

Since its first incorporation as HASI Arizona all orgs have been religious fellowships by corporation statements.

All orgs are now churches by their Church of Scientology of California affiliation.

The Minister’s Course is a requisite for permanent certification.

The legal decisions handed down on Scientology by US high courts uphold it as a religion.

It has never been anything else. It seeks SPIRITUAL FREEDOM.

This may or may not be publicly acceptable. This is NOT the point. It is a requisite defense and it is true. Those are the points.

Reinforce this in all possible ways.

Founder

L. RON HUBBARD

 

To repeat Hubbard said and obviously continues to say according to what have been called the “Scriptures of Scientology” that it is not by the Churches affiliation with the Church of Scientology International but that “(a)ll orgs are now churches by their Church of Scientology of California affiliation.”

“Curious and curiouser” to quote a popular book amongst Scientologists who have done any training in the Technology of Scientology.

The legal and corporate documents say one thing but the policies or the “scriptures” of Scientology say something else entirely.

An outpoint according to the Data Series known as “contrary facts”.

Is there any wonder that there is so much confusion and upset in Scientology Community?

Much of it beginning in the early 1980’s when as some say the new management seized control of the Organization and established a new corporate structure for Scientology Organizations and began to “abolish” networks such as the Guardian and Controllers Office in violation of the following policy:

HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE

Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO POLICY LETTER OF 9 AUGUST 1972

SENIORITY OF ORDERS

 

No Aides Order or Flag Bureaux Data Letter or Executive Directive, Direc- tive or Base Order of any type or kind, written or verbal, may alter or cancel any policy letter or HCOB. These remain senior.

HCO Policy Letters are senior in admin. HCO Bulletins are senior to all other orders in tech.

Only Policy Letters may revise or cancel Policy Letters. Only HCOBs may revise or cancel HCOBs.

No Aides Order or other directive or order may abolish a network or org or change the form of an org.

HCO PLs and HCOBs require passing by LRH or the full authority of Inter- national Board members as well as the Authority and Verification Unit.

Telexes which inform orgs or executives of modifications or cancellations of HCO PLs or HCOBs must quote the revision HCO PL or HCOB, and the revision must in fact exist and itself be issued and follow.

Any practice by which junior issues such as directives abolish networks or make off-policy changes can only result in the destruction of networks, orgs and tech.

This is therefore a HIGH CRIME policy letter and it is an offense both to follow or obey or issue any verbal or written order or directive which is contrary to or changes or “abolishes” anything set up in HCO Policy Letters or HCOBs, including the downgrade of “that’s out-of-date” or “that’s been cancelled” without showing the HCO PL or HCOB which revises or cancels.

HCO PLs and HCOBs are proven by time and are the senior data on which we operate.

L. RON HUBBARD

Founder

Again as Hubbard says:

This is therefore a HIGH CRIME policy letter and it is an offense both to follow or obey or issue any verbal or written order or directive which is contrary to or changes or “abolishes” anything set up in HCO Policy Letters or HCOBs, including the downgrade of “that’s out-of-date” or “that’s been cancelled” without showing the HCO PL or HCOB which revises or cancels.

HCO PLs and HCOBs are proven by time and are the senior data on which we operate.

 

Yet so far as can be seen the Organization itself not only no longer offers Standard Tech having replaced it with an ersatz version known as the “Golden Age of Tech” but obviously seems to operating on something other then policy which is the reason why I chose to call it “Shadow Management”.

One that itself  does not exist in policy but seems to over shadow it.

What could be considered a conspiracy or cabal of sorts “managing” Scientology in some way other then the what is covered in policy.

Hiding behind a facade of legal documents granting it legitimacy  or seeming to by careful perception management or agreement.

Worse not only is this bastardization of Scientology accepted by many Scientologists but has been granted 501Ciii status by David Miscavige’s “mutual” friends in the Internal Revenue Service.

Something I will go into further detail later when we explore Scientology’s so called “victory” over the IRS.

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s